Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE

mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:
minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;mso-ansi-language:EN-AU;mso-fareast-language:
EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA">Christopher Neff, PhD candidate, Department of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney  

Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE

Larry Saha Seminar Room 2175, Level 2, Haydon-Allen Building, The Australian National University

Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE Normal 0 false false false EN-AU X-NONE X-NONE

Shark bites can teach us a lot about public policy. As the most globally dispersed human-wildlife conflict in the world, policy comparisons following shark bites are available from Jeffrey's Bay to Jervis Bay and Cape Cod to Cape Town. At issue; however, is not a question about sharks but a question about people and politics: what factors are at work in the adoption of "knee-jerk" policy responses? I use the shark bite policy responses of the Barnett Government in Western Australia to illustrate an affect-centred policy design framework. I review the impacts of affect on agenda setting, policy entrepreneurship and response selection. In particular, I argue that the speed of policy responses has been an under-studied element of policy design and that affect offers a critical piece of this lingering puzzle. Understanding knee-jerk reactions is important because they can create legacies that inform future policymaking and because of the wide breadth of issues impacted. From livestock slaughter, gun-violence, and international terrorism to computer crime and political scandals; the cement of short-term fixes can dry into political path dependencies. Shark bite policy responses provide a valuable case study to explore these issues and examine the way emotion fits into policy frameworks.